Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
dev
79ea89713e Phase 1: license enforcement, threat pack, Apache-2.0, real Action verification
Make the product buyable and the open-source claim true.

Licence system, end to end. license.rs was well-designed dead code; wire
it up: an Ed25519-signed token (same key and verify-before-parse discipline
as definition packs), `hound license install`, houndd loads and verifies at
boot, and the execution gate and full supply-chain feed now gate on
Capability checks. Verification failing always degrades to Free, never to a
locked-out security tool; an expired licence downgrades with the reason
shown. Adds tools/issue-license.py.

Hound Linux threat pack. 34 curated YARA rules — miners, IoT/DDoS bots,
backdoors, rootkits, ransomware, webshells, droppers, reverse shells —
shipped through a new signed rules-pack channel (.rpack) alongside the
definitions feed. Every rule is ELF- or size-anchored and keyed on
family strings, never syscalls; the builder refuses to sign a pack that
matches a system binary (the goodware gate caught two bad rules), and a
regression test proves every rule fires on a sample and stays quiet on a
document about malware.

Action signature verification. The composite action claimed Ed25519
verification "against the same signed manifest the desktop agent uses" but
only compared a same-host sha256. It now fetches latest.json, verifies the
Ed25519 signature over the canonical release statement against the pinned
release key, and installs the checksum from the verified manifest.

Licence resolved to Apache-2.0: Cargo.toml, a real LICENSE file, README.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 15:51:33 -05:00
Hound
3be16eeef9 hound-defs: OSV ingest, the IOC index, and signed packs
Phase 3's foundation. Three jobs that share a data model:

  osv    parse the ossf/malicious-packages feed (Apache-2.0, ~226k
         records, daily) into indicators
  index  answer "is this package known bad?" fast enough to ask it
         thousands of times per project sweep
  pack   sign a definitions pack, and verify one before loading it

Validated against the real feed rather than fixtures: the whole
crates.io OSV export, 2,749 records, parsed with zero failures — 3,885
indicators across ten ecosystems, 19 of them MAL-. `rustdecimal` (the
real typosquat of rust_decimal) resolves in crates.io and stays clean
in npm and PyPI, which is the ecosystem isolation working.

Notes on the three:

* A malicious-package record is not a vulnerability record. It almost
  always carries introduced:"0" with no fix, meaning EVERY version is
  malicious — the package exists only to be malware, so there is no safe
  version to upgrade to. Conflating that with a version-bounded
  vulnerability either misses real hits or condemns safe versions of
  legitimate packages, so the two are modelled separately.

* The index is a cuckoo filter in front of a map. Cuckoo rather than
  bloom specifically because a definitions feed needs DELETION: OSV
  withdraws records — it once withdrew 157 malware reports after a
  false-positive incident — and a filter you cannot remove from means a
  withdrawn record costs a probe forever or forces a rebuild. 226k
  indicators fit in under 4 MB; the crates.io set is 8 KB.

  The property that must never break is no false negatives, and it has
  its own test. A false positive costs a hash lookup; a false negative
  is malware reported as clean. That is also why a fingerprint hashing
  to zero is nudged to one — zero marks an empty slot, so without the
  nudge one key in 65,536 would silently vanish.

* Signing is not about entitlement; the subscription gates the server.
  It answers "is this pack really from us?", because someone who can
  substitute a definitions file can add an entry for /usr/bin/sudo and
  have Hound quarantine it on every machine that updates — a supply
  chain attack delivered through the security product. Verification
  happens on the raw bytes BEFORE anything parses them, so a hostile
  pack never reaches the parser at all.

256 tests pass across the workspace.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 07:06:00 -05:00